I first learned about synchronicity directly from the writings of Carl Jung. So I never really understood how it has been adopted by mystics, spiritualists, and others as a way to try to explain things that it was never meant to explain. The “Synchronicity Key” is one of those books.
I understand now why Jung is so often accused of being a mystic (he wasn't, he was an intellectually rigid scientist who followed the scientific evidence even when it contradicted common sense, as any true scientist should). This book makes a lot of far-fetched claims that most would consider pseudoscience at best. And it claims outright that synchronicity is “the key that unlocks the greatest mystery of all time”. Jung himself was very adamant about not trying to explain synchronicity, or suggesting that it could be used to explain anything. He simply and meticulously documented what it was, and the evidence of its existence.
Nonetheless, I found this book interesting, even though Jung humself would probably wince at the title alone. It strongly supports my own beliefs in a single Universal Intelligence that is the source of all being, and a coming “Golden Age”. Though I didn't come to these beliefs in anything like the way Wilcock does (i.e. through intellectual analysis of patterns in history). I don't completely dismiss Wilcock's discussion; but I don't think it is as convincing as a simple honest look within ourselves can be.
"Read! Read! Read! And never stop until you discover the knowledge of the Universe." - Marcus Garvey
December 29, 2015
December 3, 2015
Waking, Dreaming, Being: self and consciousness in neuroscience, meditation, and philosophy --- by Evan Thompson (2015
I found out about this book from a book review. It appeared to be exactly the kind of book I have been hoping to find for a long time, and it turned out to be better than I hoped. Thompson does an excellent and thorough job of analyzing, comparing, and contrasting modern science with (mostly Eastern) philosophy. He brings out numerous subtle points that will --- I believe --- have a profound impact some day (as more people come to realize the significance of this understanding, and hence "waking up" from the "dream" of self-ish existence) on all aspects of our culture, from crime to politics.
[J.D. Nov. 18, 2015]
September 18, 2015
The Cider House Rules – by: John Irving
A friend of mine sent me this book as a
gift, knowing how much I enjoy reading an intelligently written
story. I was familiar, of course, with Irving, and had read and
enjoyed at least a couple of his books before (i.e. The World
According To Garp, and The Hotel New Hampshire – both excellent
stories). Irving is a good storyteller, and anyone interested in the
art of telling a good story would be well advised to read his books
to see how it should be done. And since so many people have been
suggesting to me lately that I should write a «story», I was glad
for Irving's example of how it should be done.
A Clockwork Orange – by: Anthony Burgess (1962, 1986)
I read this book in tandem with my
girlfriend, one chapter a day over the course of twenty-one days. My
girl had seen the movie, but never read the book; and I had never
heard much of either until my lawyer mentioned that some of my own
ideas about the importance of our «freedom to choose» seemed to be
reflected in this story. My lawyer had only seen the movie himself,
but since I can't just get the movies that I want to see for any
reason in here I asked my girlfriend if she wanted to read the book
with me (something we like to do on occassion as a way to share an
experience together even though we're thousands of kilometers apart
--- kind of like dating).
Burgess, the author, comes close to my
idea about the importance of free choice (as opposed to a system of
oppressive laws that restrict our choices). But, he only does so on
his way to making another point about free will itself (i.e. personal
volition). Definitely a thought-provoking book, and my girl says the
book makes more sense than the movie did; but, I still would of liked
to have seen the movie myself. I think it could help me better
understand the «tone» of the book that I suspect is so crucial to
the artistic intention.
February 24, 2015
Man and His Symbols – Ed. by: Carl Jung (1964)
Jung
wasn't known for writing books for the layperson, but this is one of
the very few he did. A friend got this book for me some time ago
after we had been discussing Jung's work and the influence of the
“collective unconscious” on our modern minds, not to mention
dreams and their meanings (which this book can't avoid discussing).
Brother of Sleep – by: Robert Schneider (1992); translated by: Shaun Whiteside (1995)
I
got this book as a surprise birthday gift and enjoyed reading it,
though I disagree with the main premise; namely that genuis can be
lost to the world if it cannot flourish because of worldly
circumstances. I don't believe any true talent, or genius, is ever
lost, because it is always derived from a larger whole. What doesn't
emerge in one place (or person) will eventually find expression
someplace else. The story is well told though, and provides lots of
food for thought.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Magic and Mystery in Tibet - by: Alexandra David-Neel (1932, 2014)
This is one of those rare books that exposes another culture in a way that really opens it up an lets the reader glimpse for themselves what...
-
This is one of those rare books that exposes another culture in a way that really opens it up an lets the reader glimpse for themselves what...
-
"The true story of the Steven Stayner abduction case." I never heard about this case until I saw a documentary about it on 20/2...
-
Another valuable gift from much more than a friend that I must also surrender due to the five-book-limit for BOP prisoners regardless ...