Needless
to say, I was not impressed. And I’m even less impressed by the fact that
so-called “experts on psychopathy” often refer to this book with religious
tones, and unashamedly refer to Cleckley as the “founding father [of
psychopathology]”. I list it here because it is a book I read after I started
writing for this blog (while in Riverside County Jail, back in 2010), and
because anyone interested in the rise of the psychopath myth should read it;
because it is after all the primary source of the myth itself.
"Read! Read! Read! And never stop until you discover the knowledge of the Universe." - Marcus Garvey
June 28, 2014
The Mask of Sanity: An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues About the So-Called Psychopathic Personality – by: Hervey Cleckley (1941)
This is
the book that historically established the “psychopath” as an American fixture.
At the time it was written the term “psychopath” was scarcely used and had no
clear definition (like the term “witch” before the Malleus Maleficarum was
written). The Mask of Sanity didn’t so much define the term as much as it
identified the so-called phenomenon. It did this by using numerous case studies
as examples, rather than any kind of concise, or even clear, scientific definitions.
In fact, Cleckley’s methods of establishing the existence of psychopaths are a
remarkable reflection of the reasoning used in the Malleus Maleficarum itself.
Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle: From The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 8, Bollingen Series XX (1960), translated by: R.F.C. Hull (1973), 2010 edition
This
book, originally a scientific paper written by one of my favorite scientists of
all time (one of the rare scientists willing to admit to the crippling
limitations of the so-called scientific method), was a bit over my head. Jung
assumes he is writing for other well educated scientists, and makes no qualms
about quoting Greek, Latin, or some other original source to make a point. Thus
many points are lost to me, but I was able to understand enough to at least
bolster my own grasp of what Jung himself considered his most significant
contribution to the art of science: synchronicity.
Jung is
the only scientists I know of who seems to understand the material reality of
the immaterial phenomenon I like to call the Living truth, which he calls the
psychoid, and is the basis of numerous theological and metaphysical concepts,
such as Christ and Buddha, to mention just two.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Magic and Mystery in Tibet - by: Alexandra David-Neel (1932, 2014)
This is one of those rare books that exposes another culture in a way that really opens it up an lets the reader glimpse for themselves what...
-
This is one of those rare books that exposes another culture in a way that really opens it up an lets the reader glimpse for themselves what...
-
"The true story of the Steven Stayner abduction case." I never heard about this case until I saw a documentary about it on 20/2...
-
Another valuable gift from much more than a friend that I must also surrender due to the five-book-limit for BOP prisoners regardless ...